Anest. intenziv. Med. 2019;30(6):288-295 | DOI: 10.36290/aim.2019.078

The year in review - robot-assissted surgery in the Czech RepublicReview Article

J. Schraml1, M. Broul1,*, J. Rejholec1,2, I. Blšťák1,3, M. Vančo1,3, K. Sláma1,4, V. Kokoška1
1 Klinika urologie a robotické chirurgie, Masarykova nemocnice, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
2 Chirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice Děčín
3 Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika, Masarykova nemocnice, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
4 Klinika ORL a chirurgie hlavy a krku, Masarykova nemocnice, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

The authors show the current view of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in the Czech Republic (CR) from the perspective of a multi-disciplinary robotic surgery center.

Keywords: robotic surgery

Received: November 13, 2019; Accepted: December 9, 2019; Published: January 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schraml J, Broul M, Rejholec J, Blšťák I, Vančo M, Sláma K, Kokoška V. The year in review - robot-assissted surgery in the Czech Republic. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2019;30(6):288-295. doi: 10.36290/aim.2019.078.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Jiménez-Rodríguez RM. Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;3:1807-1815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Ramachandra M, Farooq M, et al. Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:241-248. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2012;187:2087-2092. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168:945-649. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388:1057-1066. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, et al. Robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: a systematic review and an meta-analysis update. Oncotarget. 2017;8:32237-32257. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Sammon JD, et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the Nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol. 2014;191:907-912. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1023-1033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Eyraud R, Long JA, Snow-Lisy D, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes. Urology. 2013;81:1246-1252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Shuch B, Singer EA, Bratslavsky G. The surgical approach to multifocal renal cancers: hereditary syndromes, ipsilateral multifocality, and bilateral tumors. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39:133-148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:430-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92:232-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2014;65:340-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Gravas S, Bach T, Drake M, et al. EAU Guidelines Managment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). European Association of Urology, 2017. Available at: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/13-Non-Neurogenic-Male-LUTS_2017_web.pdf. Accessed June 2018.
    17. Humphreys MR, Miller NL, Handa SE, Terry C. Holium laser enucleation of the prostate - outcomes independent of prostate size? J Urol. 2008;180:2431-2435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Asimakopoulos AD, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach - a systematic review. J Endourol. 2012;26:960-967. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:513-515. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter A, et al. Robot-assisted Millin's retropubic prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol. 2008;15:4101-4105.
    21. John H, Bucher C, Engel N, et al. Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy. Urology. 2009;73:811-815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Uffort EE, Jensen JC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: an alternative minimal invasive approach for prostate adenoma. J Robot Surg. 2010;4:7-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Matei DV, Spinelli MG, Nordio A, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl. 2008;9:337. Go to original source...
    24. Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2011;25:641-644. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Vora A, Mittal S, Hwang J, Bandi G. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100 grams. J Endourol. 2012;26:499-502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int. 2012;110:972-979. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012;109:426-433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Clavijo R, Carmona O, Palmer KJ, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol. 2013;27:328-332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Banapour P, Patel N, Kane CJ, et al. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and report of a single institution case series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17:1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Leslie S, de Castro Abreu AL, Chopra S, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66:321-329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Pokorny M, Novara G, Geurts N, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Eur Urol. 2015;68:451-457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:86-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Patel ND, Parsons JK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: is there evidence to go beyond the experimental stage? Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Martín Garzón OD, Azhar RA, Brunacci L, et al. One-year outcome comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and robotic intrafascial simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2016;30:312-318. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Umari P, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, et al. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostates (>100ml): a comparative analysis from a high volume center. J Urol. 2017;197:1108-1114. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Qazi H, et al. Extraperitoneal approach for robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy. Urology. 2014;84:1099-10105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Sorokin I, Sundaram V, Singla N, et al. Robot-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: a propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes. J Endourol. 2017;31:1164-1169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    38. Chade DC, Eastham J, Graefen M, et al. Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;61:961-971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Jamal K, Challacombe B, Elhage O, et al. Successful salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after external beam radiotherapy failure. Urology. 2008;72:1356-1358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Dogra PN, Regmi SK, Singh P, et al. Lower ureteral stones revisited: expanding the horizons of robot. Urology. 2013;82:95-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. Williams SK, Leveillee RJ. Expanding the horizons: robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter. J Endourol. 2009;23:457-461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. Schimpf MO, Wagner JR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery. J Soc Laparoscop Soc. 2009;13:44-49.
    43. Glinianski M, Guru KA, Zimmerman G, et al. Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction for urothelial carcinoma. J Endourol. 2009;23:97-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN. Experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery for upper and lower benign and malignant ureteral pathologies. Urology. 2010;76:1387-1393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. Patil NN, Mottrie A, Sundaram B, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation. Urology. 2008;72:47-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. McClain PD, Mufarrij PW, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery for ureteral malignancy: analysis of efficacy and oncologic outcomes. J Endourol. 2012;26:1614-1617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    47. Kozinn SI, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A. Robotic versus open distal ureteral reconstruction and reimplantation for benign stricture disease. J Endourol. 2012;26:147-151. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Baldie K, Angell J, Ogan K, et al. Robotic management of benign mid and distal ureteral strictures and comparison with laparoscopic approaches at a single institution. Urology. 2012;80:596-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    49. Isac W, Kaouk J, Altunrende F, et al. Robot-assisted ureteroneocystostomy: technique and comparative outcomes. J Endourol. 2013;27:318-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    50. Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A, et al. Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int. 2013;111:773-783. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    51. Gellhaus PT, Bhandari A, Monn MF, et al. Robotic management of genitourinary injuries from obstetric and gynaecological operations: a multi-institutional report of outcomes. BJU Int. 2015;115:430-436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    52. Fifer GL, Raynor MC, Selph P, et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction distal to the ureteropelvic junction: a large single institution clinical series with short-term follow up. J Endourol. 2014;28:1424-1428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    53. Slater RC, Farber NJ, Riley JM, et al. Contemporary series of robotic-assisted distal ureteral reconstruction utilizing side docking position. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41:1154-1159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    54. Wason SE, Lance RS, Given RW, Malcolm JB. Robotic-assisted ureteral re-implantation: a case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:503-507. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    55. Stolzenburg JU, Rai BP, Do M, et al. Robot-assisted technique for Boari flap ureteric reimplantation: replicating the techniques of open surgery in robotics. BJU Int. 2016;118:482-484. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    56. Franklin A, Pokala N, Jones C, et al. Is the robotic approach feasible for repair of iatrogenic injuries of the lower ureter? World J Urol. 2016;34:1323-1328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    57. Schiavina R, Zaramella S, Chessa F, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic ureteral stenosis repair: a multi-institutional experience with a long-term follow-up. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:323-330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    58. Davol P, Sumfest J, Rukstalis D. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 2006;67(199):e7-e8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    59. Eichel L, Mc Dougall EM, Clayman RV. Fundamentals of laparoscopic and robotic urologic surgery. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;9.
    60. O'Malley BW, Weinstein GS. Transoral Robotic Surgery daVinci Procedure Guide. PN 871671 Rev. 2008;3-17.
    61. Aubry K, Yachine M, Perez AF, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: a series of 17 cases. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128:290-296. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    62. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Hoboken. 2009;22-62. Go to original source...
    63. Bradford CR. Selective neck dissection is an option for early node-positive disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;42(8):837-841. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    64. Pathak KA, Das AK, Agarwal R, et al. Selective neck dissection (I-III) for node negative and positive necks. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:837-841. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    65. Weistein GS, O'Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS, et al. Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:1701-1707. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    66. Mercante G, Ruscito P, Pellini R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery(TORS) for tongue base tumours. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33:230-235. Go to PubMed...
    67. Park YM, Kim WS, Byeom HK, et al. Surgical techniques and treatment outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:670-677. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    68. Moore EJ, Olsen SM, Laborde RR, et al. Long-term functional and oncologic results of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcioma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:219-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.