Anest. intenziv. Med. 2018;29(6):322-327

Administration of 500 ml of normal saline does not result in immediate damage to the endothelial glycocalyx determinable by sublingual microcirculation assessmentCelková anestezie - původní práce

J. Pouska1,2,*, D. Astapenko3,4, V. Tégl1,2,5, J. Beneš1,2,5, V. Černý3,4,6,7,8,9
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň
2 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Lékařská fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
3 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
4 Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Univerzita Karlova
5 Biomedicínské centrum, Lékařská fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
6 Klinika anesteziologie, perioperační a intenzivní medicíny, Univerzita J. E. Purkyně, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem
7 Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví
8 Centrum pro výzkum a vývoj, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
9 Dept. of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Kanada

Objective:
Assessment of endothelial glycocalyx alteration after infusion of 500 ml of normal saline by perfused boundary region (PBR) parameter in twelve healthy volunteers.


Hypothesis:
Endothelial glycocalyx will be significantly altered by infusion of 500 ml of normal saline.

Design:
Non-randomized, prospective, double-centre study.


Settings:
Two ICUs in University Hospitals.

Materials and methods:
Twelve healthy volunteers without acute illness were recruited. 500 ml of normal saline was infused to each participant. We collected basic haemodynamic data as well as perfused boundary region as a marker of endothelial glycocalyx integrity before and after the fluid administration. Student T-test (paired) with p-value of 0.05 was used for the statistical analysis.

Results:
After administration of 500 ml of normal saline there was non-significant change in PBR (2.00±0.21 vs. 2.21±0.36, p = 0.089). Concerning the macrohaemodynamics, there was a significant drop in the heart rate after the infusion (74±10 vs. 68±10, p = 0.003).

Conclusion:
Our study did not confirm alteration of the endothelial glycocalyx after intravenous administration of 500 ml of normal saline to healthy volunteers. There was a significant decrease of heart rate after the infusion but no other changes were observed.

Keywords: microcirculation; intravenous infusion; endothelial glycocalyx

Received: July 23, 2018; Accepted: November 1, 2018; Published: December 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pouska J, Astapenko D, Tégl V, Beneš J, Černý V. Administration of 500 ml of normal saline does not result in immediate damage to the endothelial glycocalyx determinable by sublingual microcirculation assessment. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2018;29(6):322-327.
Download citation

References

  1. Jacob M, Chappell D. Reappraising Starling: The physiology of the microcirculation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19:282-289. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283632d5e. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Cerny V, Astapenko D, Brettner F, et al. Targeting the endothelial glycocalyx in acute critical illness as a challenge for clinical and laboratory medicine. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2017;54:343-357. doi:10.1080/10408363.2017.1379943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Murphy LS, Wickersham N, McNeil JB, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx degradation is more severe in patients with non-pulmonary sepsis compared to pulmonary sepsis and associates with risk of ARDS and other organ dysfunction. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:102. doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0325-y. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1333-1337. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Oberleithner H, Peters W, Kusche-Vihrog K, et al. Salt overload damages the glycocalyx sodium barrier of vascular endothelium. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 2011;462:519-528. doi:10.1007/s00424-011-0999-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chappell D, Bruegger D, Potzel J, et al. Hypervolemia increases release of atrial natriuretic peptide and shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx. Crit Care. 2014;18:1-8. doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0538-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cerny V, Astapenko D, Burkovskiy I, et al. Glycocalyx in vivo measurement. Jünger M, Krüger-Genge A, Jung F, eds. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;67:1-5. doi:10.3233/CH-179235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Lee DH, Dane MJC, Van Den Berg BM, et al. Deeper penetration of erythrocytes into the endothelial glycocalyx is associated with impaired microvascular perfusion. PLoS One. 2014;9:1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096477. Go to original source...
  9. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1529-1537. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ukor IF, Hilton AK, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R. The haemodynamic effects of bolus versus slower infusion of intravenous crystalloid in healthy volunteers. J Crit Care. 2017;41:254-259. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.036. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Rehm M, Bruegger D, Christ F, et al. Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx in patients undergoing major vascular surgery with global and regional ischemia. Circulation. 2007;116:1896-1906. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.684852. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Zeng Y, Tarbell JM. The adaptive remodeling of endothelial glycocalyx in response to fluid shear stress. Vinci MC, ed. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Powell M, Mathru M, Brandon A, et al. Assessment of endothelial glycocalyx disruption in term parturients receiving a fluid bolus before spinal anesthesia: a prospective observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:330-334. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.06.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Puskarich MA, Cornelius DC, Tharp J, et al. Plasma syndecan-1 levels identify a cohort of patients with severe sepsis at high risk for intubation after large-volume intravenous fluid resuscitation. J Crit Care. 2016;36:125-129. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.027. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Self WH, Semler MW, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:819-828. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1711586. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Mccluskey SA, Karkouti K, Wijeysundera D, et al. Hyperchloremia after noncardiac surgery is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality: A propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:412-421. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318293d81e. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kusche-Vihrog K, Schmitz B, Brand E. Salt controls endothelial and vascular phenotype. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 2015;467:499-512. doi:10.1007/s00424-014-1657-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Vlahu CA, Lemkes BA, Struijk DG, et al. Damage of the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Dialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1900-1908. doi:10.1681/ASN.2011121181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Ince C, Boerma EC, Cecconi M, et al. Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2018:1-19. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5070-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.