Anest. intenziv. Med. 2012;23(1):33-41

Quality of epidural analgesia and incidence of early complications after major surgeryAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

Leštianský Boris1,*, Jelínek Milan1, Klimeš Jiří1, Zvoníčková Dagmar1, Pavlík Tomáš2, Šrámek Vladimír1, Hakl Marek1
1 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně
2 Institut biostatistiky a analýz Masarykovy univerzity

Objective:
The goal of the study was to determine the relationship between chronic vertebral history, difficult epidural insertion, quality of postoperative epidural analgesia and incidence of early complications after major surgery on the first postoperative day.

Design:
Anonymous, questionnaire, non-interventional, observational study.


Setting:
ICUs of the 1st Dept. of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery and Orthopaedics; the Acute Pain Service and the Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital of St. Anna, Brno, Czech Republic.

Materials and methods:
The total 62 patients came mainly from two groups: thoracotomy (n = 21), insertion height T5-T6 (76.2%), and laparotomy (n = 24), insertion height T10-T11 (62.5%). The secondary group was the arthroplasty group (n = 17), insertion height L4-L5 (100%). The study protocol included peri-operative data (vertebral history, type of procedure, complications during puncture and catheterization of the epidural space) and postoperative evaluation (the quality of pain relief and incidence of early complications). The main groups underwent combined anaesthesia (general anaesthesia: O2 + air + sevoflurane, epidural: 15-20 mg bupivacaine pre-operatively, then10 mg per hour continuously).

Results:
The quality of analgesia (using VAS: 0-3 sufficient, 4-5 uncomfortable, over 5 ~ inadequate analgesia) in the thoracotomy group was sufficient in 57.1%, discomfort in 23.8% and poor in 19.1%. In this group were observed these early complications: sensory deficit in 14.3%, motor deficit in 14.3% and hypotension in 9.6%. In the laparotomy group we observed a higher incidence of difficulties to puncture the epidural space (p = 0.027) in connection with vertebral pathology (p = 0.051). Sufficient analgesia in the laparotomy group was achieved in 75% cases, discomfort occurred in 25% and no patient had poor pain relief (0%). Early complications included sensory deficit in 29.2%, contralateral motor blockade in 4.2% and hypotension in 4.2%. A relationship between a history of chronic vertebral complaints and early complications was not demonstrated in the arthroplasty group (p = 0.637).

Conclusion:
We found good quality of epidural analgesia. The incidence of early complications was also satisfactory. Although the incidence of vertebral pathology in the laparotomy group was relatively high, its impact on the quality of postoperative analgesia was not demonstrated. No severe neurological complications were observed.

Keywords: vertebral pathology; epidural puncture difficulties; early complications; quality of epidural analgesia

Received: September 30, 2011; Accepted: January 15, 2012; Published: February 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Leštianský B, Jelínek M, Klimeš J, Zvoníčková D, Pavlík T, Šrámek V, Hakl M. Quality of epidural analgesia and incidence of early complications after major surgery. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2012;23(1):33-41.
Download citation

References

  1. Comerford, D. Troubleshooting. In Middleton, C. Epidural analgesia in acute pain management. Whurr Publisher, 2006, p. 133-159.
  2. Hadzic, A. et al. Textbook of regional anaesthesia and acute pain management. 2007, The McGraw-Hill Co., p. 230-267.
  3. Van Aken, H. Thoracic epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome. SAJAA, 2008, 14, p. 19-20. Go to original source...
  4. Procházka, J. Epidurálně podaný midazolam zesílí účinek lokálního anestetika s opioidem po operacích hrudníku. Bolest, 2010, 13 (1), p. 31-35.
  5. Jolly, A. S., Jain, P., Sood, J. Ketamine - current uses and future perspectives. J. Anesth. Clin. Pharmacology, 2007, 23 2, p. 169-181.
  6. Shobary, H. M., Sonbul, Z. M., Schricker, T. P. Epidural ketamine for postoperative analgesiain the elderly. M. E. J. Anesth., 2008, 19, p. 1369-1378.
  7. Ng, M., J., Goh, H., M. Problems related to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control. Ann. Acad. Med., 2002, 31, p. 509-515.
  8. Lavand, P., De Kock, M. The use of intraoperative epidural or spinal analgesia modulates postoperative hyperlagesia and reduces residual pain after major abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesth. Belg., 2006, 57, p. 373-379.
  9. Senard, M. et al. Effect of celecoxib combined with thoracic epidural analgesia on pain after thoracotomy. BJA, 2010, 105, p. 196-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Taleska, G. et al. Preemptive epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and sufentanyl and the effects of epiduraly added epinephrine for thoracic surgery. Macedonian J. Med. Sciences, 2010, 3, p. 46-53. Go to original source...
  11. Wheatley, R. G., Schug, S. A., Watson, D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. BJA, 2001, 87, p. 47-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hrazdilová, O. et al. Genetika a vnímání akutní bolesti. In XIV. národní kongres ČSARIM. Galén, 2007, s. 82-92.
  13. Chris, Steer et al. Best Practice in the Management of Epidural Analgesia in the Hospital Setting. 2010, dostupné na: http://www.britishpainsociety.org/pub_prof_EpiduralAnalgesia2010.pdf
  14. Grape, S., Tramer, M. R. Do we need preemptive analgesia for the treatment of postoperative pain? Best pract. Research Clin. Anaesth., 2007, 21, p. 51-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Berti, M. et al. Patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery with bupivacaine/fentanyl or ropivacaine/fentanyl. Can. J. Anaesth., 2000, 40, p. 27-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Michelet, P. et al. Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on gastric blood flow after oesophagectomy. Acta Anaest. Scand., 2007, 51, 5, p. 587-594. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Mourisse, J., Hasenbos, M. A., Gielen, M. J. et al. Epidural bupivacaine, sufentanil or the combination for the postthoracotomy pain. Acta Anaesth. Scand., 1992, 76, p. 70-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Curatolo, M. Schnider, T. W., Petersen-Felix, S. et al. A direct search procedure to optimize combinations of epidural bupivacaine, fentanyl and clonidine for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92, p. 325-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Ginosar, Y., Raley, E. T., Angst, M. S. The site of action of epidural fentanyl in humans: the difference between bolus and infusion administration. Anesth. Analg., 2003, 97, p. 1428-1438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Fleckenstein, J., Kramer, S., Offenbacher, M. et al. Etoricoxib - preemptive and postoperative analgesia (EPPA) in patients with laparotomy and thoracotomy - design and protocols. Trials 2010, 11:66, doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.