Anest. intenziv. Med. 2013;24(5):311-320

General anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade techniques in a regional and university hospitals- a three-month bicentric observational studyAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

Adamus Milan1,2,*, Herold Ivan3, Částková Adéla1, Obare Pyszková Lenka1, Reichelová Denisa1, Nováček Jiří3, Sittová Naděžda3, Čurdová Marcela3, Hrabálek Lumír2,4
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
2 Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci
3 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační oddělení, Oblastní nemocnice Mladá Boleslav, a. s.
4 Neurochirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc

Objective:
Comparison of general anaesthesia techniques focused on neuromuscular blockade in a regional and university hospitals.

Design:
Retrospective study, three-month analysis of anaesthesia charts.
Setting:
Departments of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy of a regional and university hospitals.

Materials and methods:
Anaesthetic charts for all anae-stetic procedures performed in a regional (MB2011) and university (FNOL2011) hospitals during a 3-month period (September- November 2011) were analysed, focusing on patients' demographic data, type and lenght of anaesthesia, airway maintainance, neuromuscular blockade, techniques of block reversal and monitoring. The data were compared between the hospitals (unpaired t-test, Fisher exact, Chi-squared test) with statistical significance p < 0.05.

Results:
The total number of anaesthetic procedures performed in MB2011 was 2886, in FNOL2011 4746. General anaesthesia was more frequent in FNOL2011 (92.5%) than in MB2011 (55.5%, p < 0.0001), where 27.3% of procedures were performed in regional anaesthesia (alone or supplemented with analgosedation). Procedures lasting less than 60 minutes were more frequent in MB2011 (69.2%), whereas in FNOL2011 procedures lasting over 60 minutes prevailed (64.7%). LMA was used more often in MB2011 (26.5%) than in FNOL2011 (14.2%, p < 0.0001) for airway maintenance. Neuromuscular blockade was utilised more often in FNOL2011 (61.7%) than in MB2011 (41.5%, p < 0.0001). Rocuronium was the most frequently used NMBA (MB2011 88.5%, FNOL 75.5%, p < 0.0001). Depth of blockade was monitored in 52.1% patients in MB2011, compared to 8.5% patients in FNOL2011, p < 0.0001). Neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine in 89.8% patients (MB2011) vs. 18.3% (FNOL2011, p < 0.0001), with mean dose of 0.024 ± 0.007 mg/kg (MB2011) vs. 0.019 ± 0.025 mg/kg (FNOL2011, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:
We observed differences in anaesthesia care procedures between a regional and university hospitals.

Keywords: general anaesthesia; airway; neuromuscular blockade; reversal; monitoring

Published: October 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Adamus M, Herold I, Částková A, Obare Pyszková L, Reichelová D, Nováček J, et al.. General anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade techniques in a regional and university hospitals- a three-month bicentric observational study. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2013;24(5):311-320.
Download citation

References

  1. http://www.uzis.cz
  2. Herold, I., Sittová, N., Čurdová, M., Adamus, M. Použití svalových relaxancií při celkové anestezii v operačních oborech - tříměsíční unicentrická studie v české regionální nemocnici. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2012, 23, 1, p. 6-13.
  3. Černý, V., Adamus, M., Cvachovec, K., Ševčík, P., Herold, I. Anestezie v České republice 2010 - jednodenní prospektivní observační dotazníková studie. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2011, 22, 1, p. 5-12.
  4. Adamus, M., Herold, I., Cvachovec, K., Ševčík, P., Černý, V. Svalová relaxace během celkové anestezie v České republice 2010 - jednodenní prospektivní observační dotazníková studie. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2011, 22, 2, p. 82-89.
  5. Černý, V., Cvachovec, K., Ševčík, P. et al. Doba úvodu a zotavení z celkové anestezie - prospektivní studie. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2009, 20, 5, p. 236-240.
  6. http://www.csarim.cz
  7. Adamus, M., Herold, I. Sugammadex z pohledu medicíny založené na důkazech. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2012, 23, 5, p. 237-241.
  8. Cvachovec, K. Nová farmaka - jak s nimi? Anest. intenziv. Med., 2011, 22, 4, p. 197-199.
  9. Kopman, A. F. Neostigmine versus sugammadex: which, when, and how much? Anesthesiology, 2010, 113, 5, p. 1010-1011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Miller, R. D., Ward, T. A. Monitoring and pharmacologic reversal of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade should be routine. Anesth. Analg., 2010, 111, 1, p. 3-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kopman, A. F., Eikermann, M. Antagonism of non-depolarising neuromuscular block: current practice. Anaesthesia, 2009, 64, Suppl. 1, p. 22-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Adamus, M., Bělohlávek, R., Vujčíková, M., Janásková, E. Vliv odlišných dávek rocuronia na jeho farmakodynamický profil: prospektivní studie. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2004, 15, 6, p. 269-275.
  13. Williamson, R. M., Mallaiah, S., Barclay, P. Rocuronium and sugammadex for rapid sequence induction of obstetric general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2011, 55, 6, p. 694-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Lee, C., Jahr, J. S., Candiotti, K. A., Warriner, B., Zor-now, M. H., Naguib, M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110, 5, p. 1020-1025. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Marsch, S. C., Steiner, L., Bucher, E., Pargger, H., Schumann, M.,Aebi, T., Hunziker, P. R., Siegemund, M. Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Crit. Care, 2011, 15, p. R199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sluga, M., Ummenhofer, W., Studer, W., Siegemund, M., Marsch, S. C. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases. Anesth. Analg., 2005, 101, p. 1356-1361. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Brain, A. I. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. Br. J. Anaesth., 1983, 55, p. 801-805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Donaldson, W., Abraham, A., Deighan, M., Michalek, P. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2011, 155, 2, p. 155-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Naguib, M., Kopman, A. F., Ensor, J. E. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth., 2007, 98, 3, p. 302-316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Debaene, B., Plaud, B., Dilly, M. P., Donati, F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98, 5, p. 1042-1048. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Donati, F. Neuromuscular monitoring: what evidence do we need to be convinced? Anesth. Analg., 2010, 111, p. 6-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Murphy, G. S., Brull, S. J. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth. Analg., 2010, 111, 1, p. 120-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Murphy, G. S., Szokol, J. W., Avram, M. J., Greenberg, S. B., Marymont, J. H., Vender, J. S., Gray, J., Landry, E., Gupta, D. K. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology, 2011, 115, 5, p. 946-954. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. http://www.medgadget.com/2013/05/sedasys-propofol-sedation-system-gets-fda-nod.html
  25. http://www.investor.jnj.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=761991
  26. Perel, A. Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol., 2011, 28, 8, p. 580-584. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.