Anest. intenziv. Med. 2006;17(5):251-260

Attitudes of intensivists to limiting therapy and end of life decision in the Czech Republic - a national studyIntensive Care Medicine - Original Paper

R. Pařízková1, V. Černý1, K. Cvachovec2, I. Novák3, V. ©rámek4, D. Nalos5
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny UK v Praze, LF v Hradci Králové a Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
2 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační klinika 2. LF UK a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
3 I. interní klinika UK v Praze, LF a Fakultní nemocnice, Plzeň
4 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační klinika LF Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně
5 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační oddělení, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem

Objective:
The purpose of the study was to obtain information about the attitudes of doctors working on ICUs in the Czech Republic to limiting therapy and end of life decisions (EOLD).

Design:
Prospective, multi-centre, observational study.


Setting:
ICUs in tertiary care hospitals.

Materials and Methods:
Questionnaires were posted to members of the Czech Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care on their attitude to limiting therapy in patients admitted to ICUs.

Results:
870 posted questionnaires yielded a response rate of 26%. 90% of the physicians considered limiting therapy in terminally ill patients as acceptable, 51.4% agreed with terminal respiratory weaning and 19.1% with euthanasia. EOLD may be undertaken by the competent patients themselves. 96% of responders considered the physician as the key person in EOLD for the incompetent patient. 28.9% and 43% of physicians respectively would include the nurse and the family in the decision-making process and 36.9% of physicians would respect the family's wishes in cases of differing opinion. During withholding therapy most physicians would agree with the maintenance of analgesia, sedation and infusion therapy. A written EOLD order was recorded in the patient chart in 73%. Lack of privacy and the absence of family members were considered a key obstacle to assuring dignified death.

Conclusion:
The study presents yet unpublished data regarding the attitude of the Czech Republic intensivists to the limitation of therapy and EOLD. Limitation of therapy was acceptable for the majority of responders whereas terminal respiratory weaning was refused by half of them. The absence of privacy and impersonal environment are the main obstacles to dignified dying in the ICU environment.

Keywords: limitation of therapy; intensive care

Published: October 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pařízková R, Černý V, Cvachovec K, Novák I, ©rámek V, Nalos D. Attitudes of intensivists to limiting therapy and end of life decision in the Czech Republic - a national study. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2006;17(5):251-260.
Download citation

References

  1. Černý, V., Pařízková, R., Jahodářová, R., Herold, I., Nalos, D. Ukončování ventilační podpory u nemocných v intenzivní péči. Anest. neodklad. Péče, 2001, 12, 2, s. 64-68.
  2. Harrison, D. A., Brady, A. R., Rowan, K. Case mix, outcome and lenght of sty for admission to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care NATIONAL Audit And Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Critical Care, 2004, 8, p. R 99-111. Go to original source...
  3. Sprung, C. L., Cohen, S. L. et al End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA, 2003, 13, 290 (6), p. 790-797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Poulton, B., Ridley, S., Mackenzie-Ross, R., Jizvi, S. Variation in end-of-life decision making between critical care consultants. Anaesthesia, 2005, 60, p. 1101-1105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Prendergast, T. J., Luce, J. M. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill. AJRCCM, 1997, 155, p. 15-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cardovo, T., Fonseca, T., Pereira, S., Lencastre, L. Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians. Crit. Care, 2003, 7, 6, p. 165-175.
  7. Chong, A. M., Foc, S. Y. Attitudes toward euthanasia in Hong Kong-a comparison between physicians and the general public. Death Stud., 2005, Jan-Feb, 29, 1, p. 29-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Soudry, F., Sprung, C. L., Levin, P. D., Grunfeld, G. B., Finay, S. Forgoing life-sustaining treatments: comparison of attitudes between Israeli and North American intensive care healthcare professionals. Isr. Med. Assoc. J., 2003, 5, 11, p. 770-774. Go to PubMed...
  9. Pařízková, R. Černý, V., Dostál, P., Cvachovec, K., Novák, I., ©rámek, V., Nalos, D. Omezení léčby u nemocných na pracoviątích ARO/JIP - jednodenní národní studie. Anest. intenziv. Med., 2006, 17, 5, s. 261-265.
  10. Černý, V., Pařízková, R., Nalos, D., Jahodářová, R. Etické a právní aspekty "kategorizace nemocných" v intenzivní péči. Anest. neodklad. Péče, 2000, 11, Supplementum 1, s. 37-39.
  11. Yap, H. Y. Ethical attitudes of intensive care physicians in Hong Kong: questionnaire survey. Hong Kong Med. J., 2004, 10, 4, p. 244-250. Go to PubMed...
  12. Sjokvist, P., Nilstun, T., Svantesson, M., Berggren, L. Withdrawal of life suuport - who should decide? Differences in attitudes aminy the general public, nurses and physicians. Intensive Care Med., 1999, 25, p. 949-954. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ho, K. M., Liang, J. Withholding and withdrawal of therapy in New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs): a survey of clinical directors. Anaesth. Intensive Care, 2004, 32, 6, p. 781-786. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Wenger, N. S., Carmel, S. Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors. Mt. Sinai J. Med., 2004, 71, 5, p. 335-343.
  15. Truog, R. D., Cist, A. F. M. et al: Recommendation for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Etics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2001, 29, p. 2332-2348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.