Anest. intenziv. Med. 2005;16(6):284-290

A comparison of the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure and high-frequency jet ventilation applied by naso-oral mask in patients treated for pulmonary oedemaIntensive Care Medicine - Original Paper

P. Čandík, E. Drbjáková, I. Lakatoš, P. Toya, J. Šalantay, P. Čičatko

Oddelenie anestéziológie a intenzívnej medicíny NsP Vranov nad Topľou, Slovenská republika

Objective:
Comparison of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-frequency jet ventilation applied by naso-oral mask (HFJV-M) in patients treated for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (PO).

Design:
Retrospective study.


Setting:
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine.

Material and Methods:
A group of 196 patients admitted for PO were stratified to 3 subgroups in accordance with the seriousness of the PO. The decrease in spontaneous respiratory rate, oxygenation, length of ventilatory support and length of stay in the ICU were used as indicators of treatment effectiveness (CPAP in 64 patients and HFJV-M in 132 patients) while pharmacotherapy, mean airway pressure and FiO₂ values remained very similar. The results were analysed using Student's T-test.

Results:
There were no statistically significant differences in the studied parameters between CPAP and HFJV-M in the subgroup with mild PO (subgroup 1). In the subgroups with more severe PO (subgroups 2 and 3) there were statistically significant differences in the decrease of spontaneous respiratory rate from 25-33 bpm to 18-22 bpm (P < 0.01) in the first 3 hours of ventilatory support in favour of patients ventilated by HFJV-M. Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of improvement of PaO₂, pH and PaO₂/FiO₂ index (P < 0.01) mainly during the first 2 hours of therapy again in favour of HFJV-M. There was no significant difference in the change of PaCO₂ between the two treatments. The length of required ventilatory support was 10.9 vs. 6.8 hours (CPAP vs. HFJV-M). The average length of stay in the ICU was 2.7 vs. 2.0 days, which is statistically significant (P < 0.01 vs. P < 0.05). Only 8.2% of patients participating in the study ultimately required tracheal intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation.

Conclusion:
HFJV-M is more effective than CPAP during the first 2-5 hours of therapy. The application of HFJV-M significantly shortens the length of required ventilatory support and the length of stay in the ICU. The overall incidence of tracheal intubation was low at 8.2 %.

Keywords: Non-invasive ventilation; CPAP; HFJV-M; pulmonary oedema

Published: December 1, 2005  Show citation