Anest. intenziv. Med. 2017;28(4):226-231

Preoperative assessment using mobile technologies in the Czech Republic - are our patients ready for it? Prospective, observational, multicentre, cross-sectional studyAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

T. Pařízek1, R. Gál2, J. Hložková3, P. Neumann1, J. Škola1, R. Škulec1, P. Štourač4, R. Urbanec5, T. Vymazal6, Černý V.1,7,8,9,*
1 Klinika anesteziologie, perioperační a intenzivní medicíny, Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem, Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví
2 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity
3 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Lékařská fakulta Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
4 Klinika dětské anesteziologie a resuscitace, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita
5 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava, Lékařská fakulta Ostravská univerzita
6 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, 2. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Motol
7 Centrum pro výzkum a vývoj, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
8 Dept. of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Kanada
9 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Univerzita Karlova

Objective:
The aim of our study was to find out whether patients scheduled for elective surgery owned a smartphone, had access to internet/e-mail and whether they would be willing to undergo preoperative assessment (POA) using internet/mobile devices.

Design:
Observational, prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study.


Setting:
Preoperative clinics at tertiary care hospitals in the Czech Republic.

Materials and methods:
The study was based on a simple questionnaire which the patients had to answer at the end of their POA appointment. The recorded data included age, gender, level of education, ownership of a smartphone, access to internet/e-mail and the patients' willingness to undergo remote POA. The obtained data were analysed using descriptive statistical methods.

Results:
We analysed data from 1685 patients. Total 957 (57%) of them owned a smartphone, 1330 (79%) had access to the internet and 1260 (75%) used e-mail. Total 536 patients (32%) were willing to undergo remote POA. Patients with a university degree (164 of 343, 48%) were more likely to be willing to have remote POA.

Conclusion:
More than half of the patients undergoing POA owned a smartphone, had internet connection and used e-mail. Overall one third of the patients expressed their willingness to undergo remote POA; this proportion was higher in patents with a degree.

Keywords: preoperative assessment; telemedicine

Received: March 19, 2017; Accepted: April 17, 2017; Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pařízek T, Gál R, Hložková J, Neumann P, Škola J, Škulec R, et al.. Preoperative assessment using mobile technologies in the Czech Republic - are our patients ready for it? Prospective, observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2017;28(4):226-231.
Download citation

References

  1. Sheraton TE, Wilkes AR, Hall JE. Mobile phones and the developing world. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:945-950. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Sapirstein A, Lone N, Latif A, Fackler J, Pronovost PJ. Tele ICU: paradox or panacea? Best Pract. Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23:115-126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Miguel-Cruz A, Rios Rincon A. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:44-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Siegel CA. Transforming Gastroenterology Care With Telemedicine. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:958-963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Okoroafor I, Chukwuneke F, Ifebunandu N, et al. Telemedicine and biomedical care in Africa: Prospects and challenges. Niger. J Clin Pract. 2017;20:1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Huston JL, Burton DC. Patient satisfaction with multispecialty interactive teleconsultations. J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3:205-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Applegate RL, Gildea B, Patchin R, et al. Telemedicine Pre-anesthesia Evaluation: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19:211-216. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Collins TA, Robertson MP, Sicoutris CP, et al. Telemedicine coverage for post-operative ICU patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:360-364. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Galvez JA, Rehman MA. Telemedicine in anesthesia. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:459-462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Miyashita T, Mizuno Y, Sugawara Y, et al. A pilot study of tele-anaesthesia by virtual private network between an island hospital and a mainland hospital in Japan. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:73-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Cone SW, Gehr L, Hummel R, et al. Case report of remote anesthetic monitoring using telemedicine. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:386-388. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Casavant DW, McManus ML, Parsons SK, Zurakowski D, Graham RJ. Trial of telemedicine for patients on home ventilator support: feasibility, confidence in clinical management and use in medical decision-making. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20:441-449. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Fishman M, Mirante B, Dai F, Kurup V. Patient preferences on telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation. Can J Anesth. 2015;62:433-434. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Prielipp RC, Cohen NH. The future of anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:198-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Oeveren L Van, Donner J, Fantegrossi A, Mohr NM, Brown CA. Telemedicine-Assisted Intubation in Rural Emergency Departments: A National Emergency Airway Registry Study. Telemed e-Health. 2016:tmj.2016.0140.
  16. Hanna GM, Fishman I, Edwards DA, et al. Development and Patient Satisfaction of a New Telemedicine Service for Pain Management at Massachusetts General Hospital to the Island of Martha's Vineyard. Pain Med. 2016;17:1658-1663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Nangalia V, Prytherch DR, Smith GB. Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges. Crit Care. 2010;14:233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Wood EW, Strauss RA, Janus C, Carrico CK. Telemedicine Consultations in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Follow-Up Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:262-268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, et al. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1605-1607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Roberts S, Spain B, Hicks C, London J, Tay S. Telemedicine in the Northern Territory: An assessment of patient perceptions in the preoperative anaesthetic clinic. Aust J Rural Health. 2015;23:136-141. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Turabi A, Nessen SC, Boedeker D, Boedeker B. Development of a tele-anesthesia preoperative clinic to support distant military treatment facilities for the European regional medical command. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;196:433-435. Go to PubMed...
  22. Nair AS, Mudunuri RK, Ganapathy M, Kulkarni V. Use of WhatsApp for sharing preanesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10:480-481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.