Anest. intenziv. Med. 2009;20(5):236-240

Induction and recovery times for general anaesthesia - a prospective studyAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

Černý Vladimír1,*, Cvachovec Karel2, Ševčík Pavel3, Vítková Kateřina1, Minarčíková Petra3, Gavulová Eva2, Dostálová Vlasta1, Schreiberová Jitka1, Novotný Tomáš1, Machalová Gabriela1, Brujevič Jan1, Silová Xenie1, Stoszková Andrea1, Parnicová Emília1
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
2 Klinika anesteziologie a resuscitace, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 2. lékařská fakulta a IPVZ Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
3 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Brno, Fakultní nemocnice Brno

Objective:
To establish general anaesthesia induction and recovery times.

Design:
A prospective observational study.
Setting:
Three large university hospitals.

Materials and methods:
This study enrolled patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia not expected to require postoperative ICU/HDU admission from 1st May till 30th June 2008. Patients who remained intubated after the surgical procedure were excluded from the final analysis. The observed parameters included gender, age, ASA, surgical procedure, airway management, anaesthetic drugs used, and anaesthesia induction and recovery times.

Results:
The analysis included data from 1300 patients; mean patient age was 44 years. Opioids and isoflurane were the most frequently used drugs (opioids in 1095 [84%] patients and isoflurane in 971 [75%] patients). Neuro-muscular blocking drugs (NMBD) were used in 770 (59%) patients. Tracheal intubation was used in 65% procedures and laryngeal mask airway in 29% procedures. The mean induction time was 9 minutes (CI 95% 8.7-9.7, range 1-100), the mean procedure duration 91 minutes (CI 95% 87-94, range 3-690); the mean recovery time was 3 minutes (CI 95% 2.9-3.2, range 0-35). Patients given NMBD showed a statistically significant increase in recovery time (3.5 min, CI 95% 3.3-3.7 vs. 2.4 min, CI 95% 2.2-2.6; p < 0.001). Procedure duration correlated with recovery time (correlation coefficient = 0.114; p < 0.001).

Conclusion:
The general anaesthesia mean induction time was 9 minutes and mean recovery time 3 minutes. These findings correspond with published data from other countries. The leading factors contributing to increased recovery times were the use of midazolam, NMBD and tracheal intubation, and procedure duration.

Keywords: general anaesthesia; induction; recovery

Received: May 27, 2009; Accepted: July 30, 2009; Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Černý V, Cvachovec K, Ševčík P, Vítková K, Minarčíková P, Gavulová E, et al.. Induction and recovery times for general anaesthesia - a prospective study. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2009;20(5):236-240.
Download citation

References

  1. Punjasawadwong, Y. et al. A Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2007, 17, 4, CD003843. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bhagat, H. et al. Planning for early emergence in neurosurgical patients: a randomized prospective trial of low dose anesthetics. Anesth. Analg., 2008, 107, p. 1348-1355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Katznelson, R. et al. Accelerated recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia with isocapnic hyperpnoea. Anesth. Analg., 2008, 106, 486-491. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gozdemir, M. et al. Remifentanil-propofol in vertebral disk operations: hemodynamics and recovery versus desflurane-n(2)o inhalation anesthesia. Adv. Ther., 2007, 24, p. 622-631. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Rohm, K. D. et al. Do patients profit from physostigmine in recovery from desflurane anaesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2007, 51, p. 278-283. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Juvin, P. et al. Emergence of elderly patients from prolonged desflurane, isoflurane, or propofol anesthesia. Anesth. Analg., 1997, 85, p. 647-651. Go to original source...
  7. Goto, T. et al. Xenon provides faster emergence from anesthesia than does nitrous oxide-sevoflurane or nitrous oxide-isoflurane. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86, p. 1273-1278. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Guy, J. et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86, p. 514-524. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.