Anest. intenziv. Med. 2014;25(2):107-116

Static and dynamic tests for management of volumotherapyIntesive Care Medicine - Review Article

Káňová Marcela1,*, Ševčík Pavel1,2
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny FN Ostrava
2 Katedra intenzivní medicíny a forenzních oborů, Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity

The clinical determination of the intravascular volume can be extremely difficult in critically ill patients. Fluid therapy is the first step in the resuscitation of hemodynamically unstable patients. Both underresuscitation and overresuscitation are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The resuscitation of the critically ill patient therefore requires an accurate assessment of the patients' intravascular volume status (cardiac preload) and the ability to predict the hemodynamic response after a fluid challenge (volume responsiveness). Only about half of the critically ill patients exhibit volume responsiveness - defined as the ability to increase stroke volume in response to fluid challenge. Traditional methods of determining preload (static parameters as cardiac filling pressures including the central venous pressure and the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure) have been used to guide fluid management. But now it is known, they are inaccurate and unable to predict fluid responsiveness. Dynamic parameters based on respiratory variations in venous return and subsequently stroke volume, use heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation to assess fluid responsiveness and are highly predictive. Especially the pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and the systolic pressure variation have high sensitivity and specificity in optimization of preload.

Keywords: intravascular volume status; preload; volume responsiveness; static parameters; dynamic parameters; heart-lung interaction

Received: December 18, 2013; Accepted: February 23, 2014; Published: April 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Káňová M, Ševčík P. Static and dynamic tests for management of volumotherapy. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2014;25(2):107-116.
Download citation

References

  1. Marik, P., Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy: Review. Annals of Intensive Care, 2011, 1, 1, p. 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Michard, F., Teboul, J. L. Using heart-lung interactions toassess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit. Care., 2000, 4, p. 282-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Marik, P. Hemodynamic Parameters to Guide Fluid Therapy: Trasfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine. 2010, 11, 3, p. 102-112. Go to original source...
  4. Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., Tomlanovich, M. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.N. Engl. J. Med., 2001, 345, 19, p. 1368-1377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Calvin, J. E., Driedger, A. A., Sibbald, W. J. The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patiens. Surgery, 1981, 90, p. 61-76. Go to PubMed...
  6. Reuse, C., Vincent, J. L., Pinsky, M. Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest, 1990, 98, p. 1450-1454. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Diebel, L., Wilson, R. F., Heins, J., Larky, H. Enddiastolic volume versus pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patiens. J. Trauma, 1994, 37, p. 950-955. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Wagner, J. G., Leatherman, J. W. Right-ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest, 1998, 113, p. 1048-1054. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Tavernier, B., Makhotine, O., Lebuffe, G., Dupot, J., Scherpereel, P. Systolic Pressure Variations as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sespis-induced hypotension Anesthesiology, 1998, 89, p. 1313-1321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Tousignant, C. P., Walsh, F., Mazer, C. D. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patiens. Critical Care and Trauma, Anesth. Analg., 2000, 90, p. 351-355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Michard, F., Boussat, S., Chemla, D., Anguel, N., Mercat, A., Lecarpentier, Y., Richard, Ch., Pinsky, M. R., Teboul, J. L. Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 2000, 162, p. 134-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. The ARDSNet Group. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung Indry. N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, 354, p. 2564-2575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Murphy, C. V., Schramm, G. E., Doherty, J. A., Reichley, R. M.,Gajic, O., Afessa, B. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest, 2009, 136, p. 102-109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Boyd, J. H., Forbes, J., Nakada, T., Walley, K. R., Russell, J. A.Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure increase mortality. Crit. Care. Med., 2011, 39, 2, p. 1-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Vincent, J. L., Sakr, Y., Sprung, Ch., Ranieri, M., Reinhart, K., Gerlach, H., Moreno, R., Carlet, J., Gall, J. R., Payen, D. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit. Care Med., 2006, 34, 2, p. 344-353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Marik, P., Baram, M. Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit. Care. Clin., 23, 2007, p. 383-400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pinsky, M. R., Payen, D. Funtional hemodynamic monitoring: Review. Critical Care, 2005, 9, 6, p. 566-572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pinsky, M. R. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2005, 11, p. 235-239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Osman, D., Ridel, Ch., Ray, P., Monnet, X., Anguel, N., Richard, Ch., Teboul, J. L. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit. Care Med., 2007, 35, 1, p. 1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Michard, F., Teboul, J. L. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in ICU Patients, A Critical Analysis of the Evidence: Critical Care Review. Chest, 2002, 121, 6, p. 2000-2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Teboul, J.L., Monnet, X. Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution: Commentary. Critical Care, 2009, 13, p. 175-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Shujaat, A., Bajwa, A. A. Optimalization of Preload in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Review article. Critical Care Research and Practice, 2012, article ID 761051, p. 1-14. Go to original source...
  23. Marik, P., Baram, M., Vahid, B. Does the central venous pres-sure predict fluid responsiveness? A systemic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest, 2008, 134, 1, p. 172-178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Nouira, S., Elatrous, S., Dimassi, S., Besbes, L., Boukef, R., Mohamed, B., Abroug, F. Effect of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit. Care. Med., 2005, 33, 10, p. 2339-2343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kumar, A., Anel, R., Bunnell, E., Habet, K., Zanotti, S., Marshall, S., Neumann, A., Ali, A., Cheang, M., Kavinsky, C., Parrillo, J. E. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care. Med., 2004, 32, p. 691-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Pinsky, M. R. Heart-Lung interactions. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2007, 13, p. 528-531. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Marik, P., Cavallazzi, R., Vasu, T., Hirani, A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patiens: A systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care. Med., 2009, 37, 9, p. 2642-2647. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Baker, D., Heenen, S., Piagnerelli, M., Koch, M.,Vincent, J. L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med., 2005, 31, p. 517-523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Reuter, D., Felbinger, T., Schmidt, Ch., Kilger, E., Goedje, O., Lamm, P., Goetz, A. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med., 2002, 28, p. 392-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L., Richard, Ch. Cardiopulmonary interactions in patiens with heart failure. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2007, 13, p. 6-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Mahjoub, Y., Pila, C., Friggeri, A., Zogheib, E., Lobjoie, E., Tinturier, F., Galy, C., Slama, M., Dupont, H. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients, false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventrikle. Critical Care Medicine, 2009, 37, 9, p. 2570-2575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Sakka, S. G., Hellmann, A. M., Reinhart, K. Do fluid admini-stration and reduction in norepinephrine dose improve global and splanchnic haemodynamics? British Journal of Anesthesia, 2000, 84, 6, p. 758-762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Passive leg raising: Clinical commentary. Intensive Care Med., 2008, 34, p. 659-663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Cavallaro, F., Sandroni, C., Marano, C., Torre, G., Mannocci, A.,Waure, Ch., Bello, G., Maviglia, R., Antonelli, M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid ressponsiveness: Systemic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med., 2010, 36, p. 1475-1483. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Vincent, J. L., Rhodes, A., Perel, A., Martin, G. S., Rocca, G. D., Vallet, B., Pinsky, M. R., Hofer, Ch. K., Teboul, J. L., Boode, W. P., Scolletta, S., Baron, A. V., Backer, D., Walley, K., Maggiorini, M., Singer, M. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16. Critical Care, 2011, 15, p. 229-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.