Anest. intenziv. Med. 2011;22(3):149-152

A conceptual ideal supraglottic airwayAnaesthesiology - Review articles

Miller M. Donald
Guys Hospital, London, UK

The single most important factor motivating research and development of SGAs is the associated risks of intubating patients with a tracheal tube. Predictable airway injury and the greater side-effects in the use of tracheal tubes is putting pressure on favouring SGAs over tracheal tube anaesthesia. In the future, the ability to minimize side-effects while obtaining better quality of seal in an SGA may determine the extent to which tracheal tube anaesthesia becomes a practise that will be limited to patients with full stomachs and special requirements such as thoracic anaesthesia.
The factors that influence safety as well as the various compromises that have to be made with respect to each characteristic of the various designs of supraglottic airway are discussed and quantified. These factors include quality of seal, ease of insertion, side-effects in their use, aspiration protection/access to the gastrointestinal tract and suitability for use in difficult airway scenarios. A scoring system may help us assess newer devices against what we currently have available to us and provide a more objective basis to measure or compare the various devices.

Keywords: supraglottic airway device; seal pressure; aspiration; positive pressure ventilation

Received: March 30, 2011; Accepted: April 10, 2011; Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Donald MM. A conceptual ideal supraglottic airway. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2011;22(3):149-152.
Download citation

References

  1. Tanaka, A. et al. Laryngeal resistance before and after minor surgery: endotracheal tube versus Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anesthesiology, 2003, 99, p. 252-258. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Mazen, A. et al. Is Routine Endotracheal Intubation as Safe as We think or Wish? Anesthesiology, 2003, 99, p. 247-248. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Yamanaka, H. et al. Prolonged hoarseness and arytenoid cartilage dislocation after tracheal intubation. Brit. J. Anaesthesia, 2009, 103, 3, p. 452-455. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Domino, K. B. et al. Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology, 1999, 91, p. 1703-1711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Yu, S. H., Beirne, O. R. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2010, 68, p. 2359-2376. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Brimacombe, J. Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia. 2nd Edition, WB Sanders: Philadelphia 2005, p. 555-556, 563, 140.
  7. www.proactmedical.com.au
  8. Gerstein, N. S., Braude, D. A., Hung, O., Saunders, J. C., Murphy, M. F. The Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask airway: an overview, an update. Can. J. Anaesth., 2010, 57, p. 588-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Theiler, L. G., Kleine-Brueggeney, M., Kaiser, D., Urwyler, N., Luyet, C., Vogt, A., Grief, R., Unibe, A. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask Supreme™ and the i-gel™ in simulated difficult airway secenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology, 2009, 111, p. 55-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Miller, D. M., Light, D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons ofthe streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58, p. 136-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Miller, D. M. A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: a brief review. Anesth. Analg., 2004, 99, p. 1553-1559. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.