Anest. intenziv. Med. 2008;19(2):77-81

LMA-ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is a safe option for securing the airways for laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

Zvoníčková Dagmar*, Zvoníček Václav, Klimeš Jiří, Volčík Aleš, Pelikán Karel
Anesteziologicko-resuscitační klinika, LF Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně

Objective:
The aim of study was to find if LMA-ProSeal™ safely protects the airways during laparoscopic surgery.
Type of study:
Prospective study.
Setting:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital.

Materials and methods:
Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. The results are presented as the median and the inter-quartile range, the statistical significance was evaluated by Mann-Whitney U Test and Wilcoxon match paired test.

Results:
Ninety-seven patients (M:F 35:62) aged 54 (37-64) years of age with body mass index (BMI) 26 (23-29) kg . m⁻2 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients (22%) were classed as severely obese (BMI > 30 kg . m⁻2). PLMA was inserted on the first attempt in 75 cases (77%), on the 2nd attempt in 14 patients (14%) and in the remaining 8 (8%) patients the insertion was successful on the 3rd attempt after a change of size of the PLMA. The PLMA cuff pressure was 40 (35-40) cm H₂O at the beginning of surgery; the capnoperitoneum pressure reached 13 (12-14) mm Hg. Peak airway pressure at the beginning of surgery (Pstart) was 17 (15-21) cm H₂O and increased to 22 (19-25) cm H₂O after CO₂ insufflation (Pcapno). Patients with BMI > 30 had higher Pstart [21(16-23) vs 17(14-20) cm H₂O; p = 0.002] and Pcapno [25 (22-30) vs 22 (19-25) cm H₂O; p = 0.001]. The difference between Pstart and Pcapno was also significant (p < 0.001).
A nasogastric tube was successfully inserted on the 1st attempt in 99% of patients. In one patient a "fold-over" position was revealed. No gastric contents were found in 40 (41%) patients at the end of surgery; in the remaining patients a residuum of 20 ml (10-30 ml) was detected. Regurgitation of gastric juices occurred in 3 patients. No signs of lung aspiration were found.

Conclusion:
PLMA is a safe method of airway protection during laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy; inspiratory pressure; regurgitation; pulmonary aspiration; laryngeal mask

Received: October 27, 2007; Accepted: January 8, 2008; Published: April 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zvoníčková D, Zvoníček V, Klimeš J, Volčík A, Pelikán K. LMA-ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is a safe option for securing the airways for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2008;19(2):77-81.
Download citation

References

  1. Brain, A. I. J. The LMA ProSeal: a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br. J. Anaesth., 2000, 84, p. 650-654. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Kihara, S., Brimacombe, J. Sex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomised crossover study of anesthetized male and female adult patients. Anesth. Analg., 2003, 97, p. 280-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. O'Connor, C. J. Jr., Davies, S. R. O. V., Stix, M. S. "Soap bubbles" and "gauze thread" drain tube tests. Anesth. Analg., 2001, 93, p. 1082. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. O'Connor, C. J. Jr., Borromeo, C. J., Stix, M. S. Assessing ProSeal laryngeal mask positioning: the suprasternal notch test. Anesth. Analg., 2002, 94, p. 1374-1375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Brain, A. I. J. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. Br. J. Anaesth., 1983, 55, p. 801-805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Lu, P. P., Brimacombe, J., Yang, C. et al. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Anaesth., 2002, 88, p. 824-827. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Maltby, J., Roger, Beriault, Michael, T., Watson, Neil, C. et al. The LMA-ProSealTM is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2002, 49, p. 857-862. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Bimla, S., Chand, S., Abhijit, B. et al. Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Study of 100 Consecutive Cases of Laparoscopic Surgery. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, 47, p. 467-472.
  9. Rao, R. S., Nair, S., Nair, N. S., Kamath, V. G. Acceptability and effectiveness of a breast health awareness programme for rural women in India. Indian J. Med. Sci., 2005, 59, p. 398-402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Stix, M. S., O'Connor, C. J., Jr. Depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Br. J. Anaesth., 2003, 90, p. 235-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Keller, C., Brimacombe, J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br. J. Anaesth., 2000, 85, p. 262-266. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Roberts, C. J., Goodman, N. W. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during elective laparoscopy. Anaesthesia, 1990, 45, p. 1009-1011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Halevy, A., Kais, H., Efrati, Y. Continuous esophageal pH monitoring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc., 1994, 8, p. 1294-1296. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Brimacombe, J. R., Berry, A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway. A meta-analysis of published literature. J. Clin. Anesth., 1995, 7, p. 297-305. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Warner, M. A., Warner, M. E., Weber, J. G. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology, 1993, 78, p. 56-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Cook, T. M., Nolan, J. P. The Pro-Seal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 2002, 57, p. 288-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.