Anest. intenziv. Med. 2018;29(4):187-192

Comparison of catheter high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional ventilation during interventional bronchoscopy in patients with upper airway obstructionOriginal Article

M. Paulíková1,*, P. Matula2
1 Oddelenie anestéziológie a intenzívnej medicíny, Východoslovenský onkologický ústav Košice, Slovenská republika
2 Klinika rádioterapie a onkológie, Východoslovenský onkologický ústav Košice, Slovenská republika

Objective:
To investigate the risks and safety of catheter high-frequency jet ventilation in laryngeal surgery with varying degrees of airway obstruction.

Design:
Observational, prospective study.


Setting:
Department of Anaesthesiology at an Oncological Institute.

Materials and methods:
The study included 58 patients undergoing laryngeal surgery with varying degrees of airway obstruction, who were divided into two groups: patients ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation and catheter high-frequency jet ventilation. Patients with cardiac and respiratory comorbidities, obesity and smokers were included. We evaluated the demographic data, effectiveness and safety of the two types of ventilation, and surgeon and anaesthesiologist satisfaction. The effectiveness of ventilation was assessed using arterial blood gas analysis. We were watching for complications such as hypoxia, hypercapnia, barotrauma, laryngospasm and bleeding.

Results:
58 patients were enrolled in the study, 26 (45%) of whom were ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation and 32 (55%) were ventilated by catheter high-frequency jet ventilation. 72% of the patients were male. Airway obstruction was present in 25 (43%) patients, with the tumour most often located in the supraglottic area. Hypercapnia was more common in the high-frequency ventilation group. The incidence of complication was low, barotrauma or laryngospasm were not recorded. Hypoxia was present in 3 cases (9.4%) of patients ventilated by catheter high-frequency jet ventilation. In 2 cases there was catheter displacement which necessitated conversion to conventional ventilation in one case. The surgeons preferred high-frequency ventilation.

Conclusion:
Catheter high-frequency ventilation is effective and safe even under the conditions of various degree of airway obstruction. This approach reduces the risk of entry of debris and blood into the airway and provides a clear surgical field.

Keywords: high-frequency jet ventilation; catheter; airways obstruction

Received: March 4, 2018; Accepted: May 27, 2018; Published: August 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Paulíková M, Matula P. Comparison of catheter high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional ventilation during interventional bronchoscopy in patients with upper airway obstruction. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2018;29(4):187-192.
Download citation

References

  1. Galmén K, Harbut P, Freedman J, Jakobsson JG. The use of high-frequency ventilation during general anaesthesia: An update. F1000 Research. 2017;6:756. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hunsaker DH. Anaesthesia for mikrolaryngeal surgery: the case for subglotic ventilation. Laryngoscope. 1994;104(8Pt 2 suppl 65):1-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Davies JM, et al. The Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube with jet ventilation is effective for microlaryngeal surgery. Can J Anest. 2009;56:284-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Paulíková M. Katétrová vysokofrekvenčná dýzová ventilácia pľúc a jej použitie v ORL chirurgii. Anesteziol. intenzívna med. 2017;6:46-49.
  5. Patel A, Rubin JS. The difficult airway: the use of subglottic jet ventilation for larynge-al surgery. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2008;33:22-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Davies JM. The Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube with jet ventilation is effective for microlaryngeal surgery. Can J Anest. 2009;56:284-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hautman H, Gamarra F, Henke M, et al. High frequency jet ventilation in interventional fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Anaesth Analg. 2000;90:1436-1440. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Pathak V, Welsby I, Mahmood K, et al. Ventilation and anesthetic approaches for rigid bronchoscopy. Annals ATS. 2014;11:628-633. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Leiter R, et al. Comparison of superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation with conventional jet ventila-tion for laryngeal surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia.2012;108: 690-697. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jaquet Y, Monnier P, Van Melle G, et al. Complications of different ventilation strategies in endoscopic laryngeal surgery: a 10-year review. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:52-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Bland M. An Introduction to medical statistics. IV. edition. Oxford University Press, 2015.




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.