Anest. intenziv. Med. 2006;17(6):277-280

Anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in SlovakiaAnaesthesiology - Original Paper

P. Uharčeková1, L. Pretiová1, P. Uharček2, M. Mlynček2
1 Klinika anesteziológie a intenzívnej medicíny, Fakultná nemocnica Nitra
2 Gynekologicko-pôrodnícka klinika, Fakultná nemocnica Nitra

Objective:
Birth by Caesarean section is on the increase in Slovakia. General anaesthesia is used in the majority of Caesarean sections. The risk of acid aspiration and its potential development into Mendelson's syndrome is an issue for all clinicians involved in the care of pregnant women.We conducted a retrospective study of anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Slovakia over a one-year period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005.

Design:
A retrospective study by postal questionnaire.


Setting:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, Faculty Hospital Nitra; department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty Hospital, Nitra.

Methods:
Anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section was assessed by a postal questionnaire sent to 66 Slovak obstetric departments.

Results:
A response rate of 92% was achieved. The 61 completed replies in this survey represented 93.3% of all Slovak deliveries in 2005. 60% of Caesarean sections were performed under general anaesthesia and 40% under regional anaesthesia. Pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis before Caesarean section was routinely used in 66% of departments. Intravenous H₂-blocking drugs were the most commonly used agents.

Conclusion:
According to this national survey the use of regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section is considerably less common in Slovakia than in the USA, France, the UK, Germany and other European countries. In light of the increasing rate of the Caesarean delivery, acid aspiration prophylaxis deserves more widespread attention in obstetric anaesthesia. This survey may help to initiate a discussion and to improve current anaesthetic care in obstetrics.

Keywords: anaesthesia; Caesarean section; prophylaxis; aspiration

Published: December 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Uharčeková P, Pretiová L, Uharček P, Mlynček M. Anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Slovakia. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2006;17(6):277-280.
Download citation

References

  1. Bloom, S. L., Spong, C. Y., Weiner, S. J. et al. Complications of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 106, p. 281-287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Tourtier, J. P., Compain, M., Petitjeans, F. et al. Acid aspiration prophylaxis in obstetrics in France: a comparative survey of 1998 vs. 1988 French practice. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol., 2004, 21, p. 89-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Barratt-Due, A., Hagen, I., Dahl, V. Obstetric analgesia in Norwegian hospitals. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen, 2005, 125, p. 2504-2506. Go to PubMed...
  4. Jenkins, J. G., Khan, M. M. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58, p. 1114-1118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Stamer, U. M., Wiese, R., Stüber, F., Wulf, H., Meuser, T. Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2005, 49, p. 170-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hawkins, J. L., Koonin, L. M., Palmer, S. K., Gibbs, C. P. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86, p. 277-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Schneck, H., Scheller, M., Wagner, R., von Hundelshausen, B., Kochs, E. Anesthesia for Caesarean section and Acid aspiration prophylaxis: a German survey. Anesth. Analg., 1999, 88, p. 63-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cupaník, V, Kliment M. Analýza cisárskych rezov na Slovensku za roky 1997-2001. Slov. Gynek. Pôrod., 2003, 10, Suppl 1, s. 42.
  9. Benhamou, D. French obstetric anaesthetists and acid aspiration prophylaxis. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol., 1993, 10, p. 27-32.
  10. Burgess, R. W., Crowhurst, J. A. Acid aspiration prophylaxis in Australian obstetric hospitals - a survey. Anaesth. Intensive Care, 1989, 17, p. 492-495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Van Houwe, P., Heytens, L., Vercruysse, P. A survey of obstetric anaesthesia practice in Flanders. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg., 2006, 57, p. 29-37. Go to PubMed...
  12. Jenkins, J. G., Khan, M. M. Anaesthesia for caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58, p. 1114-1118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Calthorpe, N., Lewis, M. Acid aspiration prophylaxis in labour: a survey of UK obstetric units. Intern. J. Obstetric. Anesth., 2005,14, p. 300-304. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Søreide, E., Holst-Larsen, H., Steen, P. A. Acid aspiration syndrome prophylaxis in gynaecological and obstetric patients. A Norwegian survey. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 1994, 38, p. 863-868. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hawthorne, L., Wilson, R., Lyons, G., Dresner, M. Failed intubation revisited: 17 year experience in a teaching mater-¨ nity unit. Br. J. Anaesth., 1996, 76, p. 680-684. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Hamer, M. Difficult and failed intubation in obstetrics. Int. J. Obstetric. Anesth., 1997, 6, p. 25-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.